New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2014

State v. Porras

State v. Porras
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided September 9, 2014

State v. Porras

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 33,600 DANIEL LEAL PORRAS 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY Charles Cruse Currier, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Jesse R. Cosby Roswell, NM for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge.

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 ____________________________________ 7 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 ___________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

11 ___________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.