Marquez v. Calzada
Marquez v. Calzada
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO KAREN L. MARQUEZ and MICHAEL MARQUEZ, 4 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 33,755 RICARDO CALZADA, M.D., 7 Defendant-Appellee.
8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RIO ARRIBA COUNTY Matthew Justin Wilson, District Judge Tony Scarborough Santa Fe, NM Juan Carlos Scarborough Albuquerque, NM for Appellants Chapman and Charlebois Nicole M. Charlebois Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Judge.
1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.
2 No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our calendar notice.
5 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge WE CONCUR:
10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.