Chand v. Riggs
Chand v. Riggs
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO NAREND CHAND, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 33,689 JOSEPH RIGGS, 6 Defendant-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge Narend Chand Santa Rosa, NM Pro Se Appellant Montgomery & Andrews PA Margaret A. Graham Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.
1 {1} Plaintiff is appealing from a district court order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We issued a calendar notice on August 11, 2014, proposing to affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in support. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12- 210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).
9 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 __________________________________ 11 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
12 WE CONCUR:
13 _______________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
15 _______________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.