NM Taxation & Revenue Dep't v. Exerplay, Inc.
NM Taxation & Revenue Dep't v. Exerplay, Inc.
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 4 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 33,935 EXERPLAY, INC., 7 Defendant-Appellee.
8 APPEAL FROM THE TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT Dee Dee Hoxie, Hearing Officer Gary K. King, Attorney General Peter Breen, Special Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Ray Jecklin Exerplay, Inc. Tiempo Payroll Rio Rancho, NM Exerplay, Inc. Cedar Crest, NM Pro Se Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.
3 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
6 {2} REVERSED.
7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 __________________________________ 9 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:
11 _________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge
13 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.