New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2015

Bissey v. Morris

Bissey v. Morris
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided February 19, 2015

Bissey v. Morris

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO VIRGINIA BISSEY, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 33,855 RONNIE MORRIS and LAURA MORRIS, a/k/a LAURA BRITTON, HOWARD BRITTON, TONY BRITTON and LAUREN ASHLEY BRITTON, and ZANE MORRIS and his Wife SANDRA, 9 Defendants-Appellants, and [The] Unknown Spouse [of Zane Morris], if any, and All Unknown Persons Who May Claim a Lien, Interest or Title Adverse to the Plaintiff, 14 Defendants.

15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY William G. Schoobridge, District Judge Max Houston Proctor Attorney at Law Max Houston Proctor Hobbs, NM for Appellee Ching Law Firm Alexander B. Ching Hobbs, NM for Appellants 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

7 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

10 {2} Affirmed.

11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 _______________________________________ 14 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:

17 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

19 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.