New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2015

Guzman v. Rimbert

Guzman v. Rimbert
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided March 24, 2015

Guzman v. Rimbert

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO BELEN GUZMAN, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 34,086 JOHN ALEXANDER RIMBERT, SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL, INC., aka BENEFICIAL FINANCE, AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC., RIO GRANDE TITLE CO., and FORD SIMMONS, 10 Defendants-Appellees, and SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 13 Cross-Claimant/Counter-Claimant, v. JOHN ALEXANDER RIMBERT, 16 Cross-Defendant.

17 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY C. Shannon Bacon, District Judge Belen Guzman Albuquerque, NM Pro se Appellant John Alexander Rimbert Albuquerque, NM Pro se Appellee The Simons Firm, LLP Frieda Simons Burnes Santa Fe, NM for Appellees

11 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

13 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

16 {2} Affirmed.

17 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

18 _______________________________________ 19 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:

1 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

3 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.