Meza v. Montes
Meza v. Montes
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 JAMES MEZA, SR., Individual and as Parent to and Legal Guardian of JAIME M., a Minor Child, and ARIANA DURAN, Individual, 6 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NO. 34,309 RONNIE E. MONTES, WAYNE TREERS, and JULIE TREERS, Individuals, 10 Defendants-Appellees.
11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY James T. Martin, District Judge
13 The Davis Law Firm Mark Anthony Acuna San Antonio, TX for Appellants Rincon Law Group PC Valerie Auger El Paso, TX for Appellees
2 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.
4 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
7 {2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 __________________________________ 10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
11 WE CONCUR:
12 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
14 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.