Hone v. State
Hone v. State
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO LINDA HONE, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, v. NO. 34,248 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Respondent-Appellee.
7 IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSERVATORSHIP OR GUARDIANSHIP OF OSCAR HONE
10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Sarah C. Backus, District Judge
12 Linda Hone Taos, NM Pro se Appellant Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.
3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
6 {2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 __________________________________ 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge WE CONCUR:
11 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
13 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.