New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2016

State v. Temple

State v. Temple
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided January 21, 2016

State v. Temple

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff, v. No. 34,889

5 PETER TEMPLE, 6 Defendant, ___________________________ IN RE KARA KUPPER, 9 Attorney-Appellant.

10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Stan Whitaker, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge.

1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} REVERSED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge WE CONCUR:

10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.