State v. Crabb
State v. Crabb
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 34,472 TAYLOR CRABB, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY Mercedes C. Murphy, District Judge Hector Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Plaintiff-Appellee Taylor Crabb Hobbs, NM Pro Se Appellant
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Chief Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 _______________________________ 6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
7 WE CONCUR:
8 ___________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
10 _________________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.