State v. Roybal
State v. Roybal
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 34,854 EUGENIO ROYBAL, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Sarah C. Backus, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Jacqueline R. Medina, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM Sergio Viscoli, Appellate Public Defender Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} REVERSED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 ___________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
11 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.