Roldan v. City of Albuquerque
Roldan v. City of Albuquerque
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MARIA ROLDAN, Individually and as Parent and/or Guardian of KEILA ORTIZ, DIANA ORTIZ, and KALEB GONZALEZ, Minors, and KEVIN NAVARRO, 7 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 35,140 CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE and JOHN STOTT, 11 Defendants-Appellees.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge
14 Southwest Legal Group Robert J. Andreotti Santa Fe, NM for Appellants Trisha A. Walker Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 {2} Affirmed.
7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 _______________________________________ 10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
13 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
15 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.