Kruskal v. Martinez
Kruskal v. Martinez
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO KERRY KRUSKAL, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 35,237 JUAN MARTINEZ and DIANA MARTINEZ, husband and wife, 7 Defendants-Appellees.
8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Jeff McElroy, District Judge Kerry Kruskal Arroyo Seco, NM Pro Se Appellant Carol A. Neelley PC Carol A. Neelley Santa Fe, NM for Appellees
17 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} Affirmed.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 _______________________________________ 8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
13 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.