New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2016

Purple Lupine, LLC v. Sherman & Sherman, P.C.

Purple Lupine, LLC v. Sherman & Sherman, P.C.
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided June 28, 2016

Purple Lupine, LLC v. Sherman & Sherman, P.C.

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO PURPLE LUPINE, LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability Company, 4 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 35,258 SHERMAN & SHERMAN, P.C., 7 Defendant-Appellant, and CITY OF DEMING, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Mexico, SOUTHWEST LOAN & INVESTMENT CORP., SUNBELT ANDERSON OIL COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, and MINNIE LUJAN, if living, and if deceased, Minnie Lujan’s unknown heirs, 14 Defendants.

15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY Henry R. Quintero, District Judge McCarthy & Holthus, LLP Jeannette Martinez Whittaker Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Sherman & Sherman Jakub F. Sherman Frederick H. Sherman Deming, NM for Appellant 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

7 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

10 {2} Reversed.

11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 _______________________________________ 14 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:

17 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

19 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.