Padgett v. Perez
Padgett v. Perez
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO DAVID and JODI PADGETT, 3 Petitioners-Appellees, v. No. 35,236 YOLANDA PEREZ (a/k/a YOLANDA NERI), 7 Respondent-Appellant, and GUADALUPE PEREZ, 9 Respondent.
10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY Daylene Marsh, District Judge Tucker, Burns, Yoder & Hatfield Mitchel S. Burns Farmington, NM for Appellees Carpenter & Associates Bryan Collopy Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Guadalupe Perez Glendale, AZ Pro se Respondent 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
6 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
9 {2} Affirmed.
10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
12 _______________________________________ 13 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
16 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
18 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.