Quintana v. Tapia
Quintana v. Tapia
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 DIEGO QUINTANA 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 34,970 ABRAN TAPIA, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Matthew J. Sandoval, District Judge Sommer Karnes & Associates, LLP Karl H. Sommer James R. Hawley Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Abran Tapia Upland, CA Pro Se Appellant
17 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Chief Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 _______________________________ 6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
7 WE CONCUR:
8 ___________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
10 ___________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.