New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2016

State v. Mendoza

State v. Mendoza
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided July 25, 2016

State v. Mendoza

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 35IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 35,268 PETER MENDOZA, 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY James L. Sanchez, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Peter Mendoza Santa Rosa, NM Pro se Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} Affirmed.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 _______________________________________ 8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:

11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

13 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.