New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2016

Glerup v. That Car Place

Glerup v. That Car Place
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided September 19, 2016

Glerup v. That Car Place

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MARK GLERUP, 3 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 35,406 THAT CAR PLACE, INC., 6 Employer-Appellee, and NEW MEXICO UNINSURED EMPLOYERS’ FUND, 9 Statutory Third Party-Appellee.

10 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge Michael J. Doyle Los Lunas, NM for Appellant Narvaez Law Firm, PA Henry F. Narvaez Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Richard J. Crollett, Attorney for UEF Albuquerque, NM for Statutory Third Party-Appellee 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.

6 {1} Summary reversal and remand was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal and remand has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

9 {2} Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.

11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 __________________________________ 13 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge WE CONCUR:

15 _________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

17 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.