Peterson v. Baca
Peterson v. Baca
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO LORRAINE DELORES PETERSON, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, v. No. 35,105 JULIANNA E. BACA, 6 Respondent-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY David K. Thomson, District Judge Sommer, Udall, Hardwick, Ahern & Hyatt, P.A.
10 Kurt A. Sommer Joseph P. Walsh Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Julianna E. Baca Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} AFFIRMED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 _______________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
11 _______________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.