Burns v. Proclean
Burns v. Proclean
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MICHAEL BURNS, 3 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 35,496 PROCLEAN OF ARIZONA and TRAVELERS INSURANCE, 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
8 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge Rod Dunn Rio Rancho, NM for Appellant Sebastian A. Dunlap Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
18 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
2 {2} AFFIRMED.
3 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 _______________________________ 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
6 WE CONCUR:
7 ___________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
9 ___________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.