New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2016

Karpien v. Karpien

Karpien v. Karpien
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided October 4, 2016

Karpien v. Karpien

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO DAVID KARPIEN, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, v. NO. 35,568 DAWN KARPIEN, a/k/a DAWN JOHNSON, 7 Respondent-Appellee.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY Cheryl H. Johnston District Judge The Childress Law Office Sidney P. Childress Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Trujillo Dodd, Torres, O’Brien, Sanchez, LLC Donna S. Trujillo Dodd Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Chief Judge.

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

11 _________________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.