Harold v. Doherty
Harold v. Doherty
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ROBBIN R. HAROLD, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, v. NO. 34,980 JANET DOHERTY, 6 Respondent-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Angie K. Schneider, District Judge Robbin R. Harold High Rolls, NM Pro Se Appellant John R. Hakanson Alamogordo, NM for Appellee 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.
17 {1} Summary affirmance in part and reversal in part was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance in part and reversal in part has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
3 {2} AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part as set forth in the calendar notice.
4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 __________________________________ 6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:
8 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
10 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.