New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2016

State v. Bustamente

State v. Bustamente
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided November 21, 2016

State v. Bustamente

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 35,750 ADAM BUSTAMANTE, 6 Defendant-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Charles W. Brown, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Jason Yamato, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM for Appellee The Law Offices of the Public Defender Christopher Dodd Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.

1 {1} The State sought to appeal from an order by the district court entitled “order granting Defendant’s motion to compel production of forensic copy.” [DS 2, 4; RP 11-12] We issued a notice proposing to dismiss for lack of a final, appealable order.

4 In response, the State filed a motion to dismiss, wherein the State does not oppose our proposed disposition and indicates its intent not to pursue the appeal. Defendant filed a response, requesting that this Court issue an opinion to ensure “a full and complete record in this case.”

8 {2} For the reasons stated above and set forth in our notice of proposed disposition, we dismiss the State’s appeal.

10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 __________________________________ 12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:

14 _________________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

16 _________________________________ STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.