This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 35,740 MANUEL VALDEZ, 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Fernando R. Macias, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Chief Judge.

18 {1} Defendant Manuel Valdez has sought to appeal his conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We previously issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in which we proposed to affirm. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition. After due consideration, we remain unpersuaded.

3 {2} In his memorandum in opposition, Defendant presents no new arguments but reiterates his position that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction. [MIO 2-5] We remain unpersuaded by Defendant’s argument.

6 Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm.

8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 __________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge WE CONCUR:

12 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

14 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge