Mullins v. Perez
Mullins v. Perez
Opinion
This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO THOMAS E. MULLINS, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. No. 36,118 MARY HELEN PEREZ f/k/a MARY HELEN MULLINS, 7 Respondent-Appellee.
8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge Thomas E. Mullins Farmington, NM Pro se Appellant Tucker, Burns, Yoder & Hatfield Mitchel S. Burns Farmington, NM for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION GARCIA, Judge.
19 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. Both parties filed a memorandum indicating that they agree with our proposed disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 ________________________________ 6 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge WE CONCUR:
8 _______________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
10 _______________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.