State v. Castle
State v. Castle
Opinion
This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 36,273 DAVID ELLIOTT CASTLE, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Cindy Leos, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Gorence & Oliveros, P.C.
13 Robert J. Gorence Victor E. Sanchez Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION GARCIA, Judge.
19 {1} Defendant-Appellant David Elliott Castle appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss premised on prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy grounds. We previously issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in which we proposed to affirm. Defendant has filed a response with this Court indicating that he does not intend to file a memorandum in opposition to our proposed summary disposition.
6 {2} Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated, we affirm the district court’s decision.
8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 ________________________________ 10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge WE CONCUR:
12 _______________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
14 _______________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.