Young v. Gandera
Young v. Gandera
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO YVONNE YOUNG, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, and WILLIAM YOUNG, 6 Plaintiff, v. No. A-1-CA-35907 REMEMBER ME WHEN and NICHOLE GANDARA, 10 Defendants-Appellees.
11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY Daniel Viramontes, District Judge Yvonne Young Lordsburg, NM Pro Se Appellant Nichole Gandara Lordsburg, NM Pro Se Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION GARCIA, Judge.
3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
6 {2} AFFIRMED.
7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 __________________________________ 9 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge WE CONCUR:
11 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
13 _______________________________ STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.