New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2017

State v. Orosco

State v. Orosco
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided October 10, 2017

State v. Orosco

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. A-1-CA-36230 ANDREW J. OROSCO, 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Angie K. Schneider, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Todd A. Holmes Alamogordo, NM for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION GARCIA, Judge.

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________ 7 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge WE CONCUR:

9 _______________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

11 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.