New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2017

New Mexico Medical Board v. Seidel

New Mexico Medical Board v. Seidel
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided October 3, 2017

New Mexico Medical Board v. Seidel

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO MEDICAL BOARD, 3 Appellee-Respondent, v. No. A-1-CA-36460 WALTER RAY SEIDEL, JR., M.D., 6 Appellant-Petitioner.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY Jerry H. Ritter Jr., District Judge Richard B. Word Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Miguel Garcia Alamogordo, NM for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.

17 {1} Appellant-Petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari, seeking review of disciplinary action taken by Appellee-Respondent. We granted the petition and issued a calendar notice proposing to reverse and remand. Appellee-Respondent has filed a responsive memorandum indicating that it does not oppose our proposed summary disposition. Appellant-Petitioner has filed no response, and the deadline to do so has passed.

5 {2} Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with due process considerations.

8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 __________________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

11 WE CONCUR:

12 _______________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

14 _______________________________ JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.