State v. Arenas
State v. Arenas
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. A-1-CA-36551 DAMIAN ARENAS, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY Karen L. Townsend, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Santa Fe, NM Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
19 {1} Defendant appeals from his conviction for felony DWI, entered pursuant to a conditional plea, wherein he reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm relying, in part, on State v. Hill, 2005-NMCA-143, ¶ 12, 138 N.M. 4 693, 125 P.2d 1175. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition requesting that this Court revisit our holding in Hill. However, given that our holding in Hill was premised on binding New Mexico Supreme Court precedent, we decline to revisit that holding. As a result, we conclude that Defendant has not demonstrated a speedy trial violation. Accordingly, we affirm.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 _________________________________ 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
12 WE CONCUR:
13 ___________________________ JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
15 ___________________________ STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.