New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018

State v. Keisean A.

State v. Keisean A.
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided March 1, 2018

State v. Keisean A.

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. A-1-CA-36772 KEISEAN A., 6 Child-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY John J. Romero, Jr., District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Marko David Hananel, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Santa Fe, NM Chelsea Van Deventer, Assistant Public Defender Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

1 {1} Child-Appellant Keisean A. (Child) appeals from the district court’s judgment and disposition entered following Child’s conditional plea. [RP 51, 52; DS 1] Child raised the central contention the district court erred in denying Child’s motion to dismiss based on expiration of the time limit for trial of a child in custody. [DS 3-4] This Court issued a notice proposing to summarily reverse. [CN 1, 4] The State filed a response indicating it will not file a memorandum in opposition to our notice of proposed disposition. Therefore, based on the reasons set forth in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we reverse.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 __________________________________ 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

12 WE CONCUR:

13 ______________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

15 ______________________________ EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.