Ramirez v. Sutton
Ramirez v. Sutton
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO JAIME RAMIREZ, 3 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. A-1-CA-36492 RONNIE SUTTON and NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION, INC., CO., 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
8 APPEAL FROM WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge Glen L. Houston Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Lynn & Associates, LLC Phyllis Savage Lynn Albuquerque, NM.
16 for Appellees 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} AFFIRMED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge
11 _________________________________ JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.