New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018

Secrist v. NM SPO

Secrist v. NM SPO
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided June 5, 2018

Secrist v. NM SPO

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO DANIEL J. SECRIST and KEN LONG, on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly- situated State employees, 6 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. No. A-1-CA-36950 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, NEW MEXICO STATE PERSONNEL OFFICE, and JUSTIN R. NAJAKA, New Mexico State Personnel Director, 13 Defendants-Appellants.

14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY David K. Thomson, District Judge Shane Youtz Albuquerque, NM for Appellees SaucedoChavez PC Christopher Saucedo Albuquerque, NM for Appellants 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge.

3 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.

6 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

9 WE CONCUR:

11 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

13 DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.