State v. Hudson
State v. Hudson
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. A-1-CA-36867 HIRAM HUDSON, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY Dustin K. Hunter, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Hiram Hudson Roswell, NM Pro Se Appellant
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} AFFIRMED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 ___________________________________ JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
11 _________________________________ STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.