New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018

Federal National Mortgage Association v. Carrell

Federal National Mortgage Association v. Carrell
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided September 17, 2018

Federal National Mortgage Association v. Carrell

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (“FANNIE MAE”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, 7 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. A-1-CA-37167 REBECCA CARRELL, if living; if deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF REBECCA CARRELL, deceased, and JOHN DOE CARRELL, wife and husband; CHERYL RICKS and JOHN DOE RICKS, wife and husband; GILBERT MAESTAS, if living; if deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF GILBERT MAESTAS, deceased, and MARY ALICE MAESTAS, if living; if deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF MARY ALICE MAESTAS, deceased, husband and wife; GULF COAST INVESTMENT CORPORATION; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; and OCCUPANTS OF THE PROPERTY, 25 Defendants-Appellees.

26 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Nancy J. Franchini, District Judge McCarthy Holthus, LLP Joshua T. Chappell Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Rebecca Carrell Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellee John Doe Carrell Carlsbad, NM Pro Se Appellee Cheryl Ricks Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellee Keith Ricks a/k/a John Doe Ricks Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellee Gilbert Maestas unknown Pro Se Appellee Mary Alice Maestas unknown Pro Se Appellee

1 Gulf Coast Investment Corporation unknown Pro Se Appellee Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. a/k/a CitiMortgage, Inc. c/o CT Corp. System Santa Fe, NM Pro Se Appellee 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

11 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

14 {2} REVERSED.

15 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 _______________________________ 17 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:

19 ___________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

21 ___________________________ JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.