State v. Smith III
State v. Smith III
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. A-1-CA-36899 WILLIAM E. SMITH III, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY George P. Eichwald, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee William E. Smith III Rio Rancho, NM Pro Se Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} AFFIRMED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ EMIL J. KIEHNE Judge
11 _________________________________ JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.