Sartori v. Townsend Realty
Sartori v. Townsend Realty
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ROBERT F. SARTORI, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. A-1-CA-37128 TOWNSEND REALTY, SECURITY ESCROW CORPORATION, PHYLLIS L. TOWNSEND, MELVIN L. TOWNSEND, MELVIN BRADLEY TOWNSEND, RIC THOM, 11 Defendants-Appellees, and REAL ESTATE LAW ASSOCIATES and PETER E. SPRINGER, 15 Defendants.
16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY Shannon Murdock, District Judge Robert F. Sartori McIntosh, NM Pro Se Appellant Hatch Law Firm, LLC Jesse Clark Hatch Albuquerque, NM for Appellees Townsend Realty and Melvin Bradley Townsend Garcia Law Group, LLC Bryan Christopher Garcia Albuquerque, NM for Appellees Security Escrow Corporation and Ric Thom The Garrison Law Firm, LLC Jacob A. Garrison Albuquerque, NM for Appellees Phyllis L. Townsend and Melvin L. Townsend Brant & Hunt, Attorneys John M. Brant Albuquerque, NM for Defendants Real Estate Law Associates and Peter E. Springer 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
18 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
21 {2} DISMISSED.
22 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
1 _______________________________ 2 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
3 WE CONCUR:
4 ___________________________________ STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
6 _________________________________ EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.