New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018

State v. Ness

State v. Ness
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided October 9, 2018

State v. Ness

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. A-1-CA-37014 HAROLD NESS, 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY Mercedes C. Murphy, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Harold Ness Moriarty, NM Pro Se Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge.

17 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

1 {2} AFFIRMED.

2 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 _______________________________ 4 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge WE CONCUR:

6 _________________________________ HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge

8 _________________________________ JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.