This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO NO. A-1-CA-36774 THOMAS SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY Cindy M. Mercer, District Judge Vance, Chavez & Associates Claud Eugene Vance Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Richard Hill Los Lunas, NM Pro Se Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. {2} AFFIRMED. {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge WE CONCUR: MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge