Mills v. Bancroft & Son's Trucking
Mills v. Bancroft & Son's Trucking
Opinion
MILLS V. BANCROFT & SON'S TRUCKING This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
RAYMOND E. MILLS, Worker-Appellant, v. BANCROFT & SON’S TRUCKING and REDWOOD FIRE & CASUALTY, Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
No. A-1-CA-37456 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO February 25, 2019
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION, Leonard J.
Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge COUNSEL Raymond E. Padilla, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant Hoffman Kelley Lopez LLP, Lloyd Hoffman, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees JUDGES LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, Judge. WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge, KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.