New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2019

Franklin v. Bearden

Franklin v. Bearden
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided March 4, 2019 · LINDA M. VANZI; JACQUELINE R. MEDINA; MEGAN P. DUFFY

Franklin v. Bearden

Opinion

FRANKLIN V. BEARDEN This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

BRYCE FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLIFFORD BEARDEN, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. A-1-CA-37536 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO March 4, 2019 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CIBOLA COUNTY, Pedro G. Rael, District Judge COUNSEL Bryce Franklin, Santa Rosa, NM, Pro Se Appellant.

Clifford Bearden, Grants, NM, Pro Se Appellee.

JUDGES LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge, MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. {2} AFFIRMED. {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR: JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.