New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2019

State v. Whitehead

State v. Whitehead
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided April 29, 2019 · LINDA M. VANZI; M. MONICA ZAMORA; JENNIFER L. ATTREP

State v. Whitehead

Opinion

STATE V. WHITEHEAD This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM WHITEHEAD, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. A-1-CA-37425 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO April 29, 2019 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY, Drew D. Tatum, District Judge COUNSEL Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Eran S. Sharon, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Steven James Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, Albuquerque, NM for Appellant.

JUDGES LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Chief Judge, JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge. {1} William Whitehead (Defendant) appeals from his sentencing as a five-time driving while intoxicated (DWI) offender. On appeal, Defendant argued that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence as a five-time offender, where the evidence that the State presented to establish Defendant’s identity for two of the prior convictions was insufficient, because the only evidence that contained specific identifiers linking Defendant to those priors was an inadmissible printout from an unidentified source. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to reverse. In response, the State has filed a notice of its intent not to file a memorandum in opposition to our notice of proposed disposition. {2} Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning contained in our notice of proposed disposition and we reverse the sentence imposed and remand for sentencing consistent with this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Chief Judge JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.