State v. Moreno-Hernandez
State v. Moreno-Hernandez
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. A-1-CA-37541 JOSE MORENO-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY Donna J. Mowrer, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Lindsey Law Firm, L.L.C. Daniel R. Lindsey Clovis, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE Judge WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.