New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2019

Urquijo v. Fernandez

Urquijo v. Fernandez
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided March 20, 2019
Urquijo v. Fernandez

Opinion

This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO INTERNATIONAL BANK, 3 Plaintiff, v. No. A-1-CA-36301 DONACIANO RAMON FERNANDEZ a/k/a DONNY RAY FERNANDEZ; DOLORES FERNANDEZ; THE ESTATE OF ALFREDO FERNANDEZ a/k/a JOSE ALFREDO FERNANDEZ, Deceased; DONACIANO RAMON FERNANDEZ a/k/a DONNY RAY FERNANDEZ, Personal Representative; ROBERTO URQUIJO and ELIDA F. URQUIJO, husband and wife, 15 Defendants, and ROBERTO URQUIJO and ELIDA F.

18 URQUIJO, Husband and Wife, 19 Cross-Claimants/Appellants, and DONACIANO FERNANDEZ, DOLORES FERNANDEZ, and THE ESTATE OF ALFREDO FERNANDEZ, 24 Cross-Claimants/Appellees.

1 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COLFAX COUNTY Emilio J. Chavez, District Judge Dave Eloy Romero Las Vegas, NM for Appellants Ray Allen Floersheim Raton, NM for Appellees 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.

11 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

14 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:

19 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

21 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.