Torrez v. Sanchez
Torrez v. Sanchez
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-37602 MARY TORREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RIO ARRIBA COUNTY Matthew J. Wilson, District Judge The Simons Firm, LLP Quinn Scott Simons Santa Fe, NM for Appellee David Sanchez Chama, NM Pro Se Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION VARGAS, Judge. {1} Defendant David Sanchez appeals following the district court’s final order granting Plaintiff injunctive relief and creating a prescriptive easement. [RP 236-37] This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to summarily affirm, having reviewed Defendant’s arguments in his docketing statement. In response, Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary disposition. However, Defendant has not filed a memorandum in opposition to our proposed disposition, and the time for doing so has expired. {2} Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning contained in our notice of proposed disposition and affirm the district court. {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge WE CONCUR: BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.