Stump v. Minick
Stump v. Minick
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-38485 ANDREW STUMP, Petitioner-Appellee, v. BLAYNE MINICK, Respondent-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Mary W. Rosner, District Judge Andrew Stump Youngtown, AZ Pro Se Appellee Blayne Minick Las Cruces, NM Pro Se Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION VARGAS, Judge. {1} Respondent appeals the district court’s order awarding Petitioner primary physical custody of Child. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm the district court’s order on June 25, 2020. On July 20, 2020, Petitioner filed a memorandum in support of this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. To this date, Respondent has not filed a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, and the time for doing so has now run. Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning set out in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition and we affirm. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.