State v. Ambriz
State v. Ambriz
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-38313 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TARYN AMBRIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE METROPOLITAN COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Sandra Watkins Engel, Metropolitan Court Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Robert J. Aragon, Albuquerque, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Chief Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.