New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2021

Rodriguez v. Tapia

Rodriguez v. Tapia
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided January 29, 2021

Rodriguez v. Tapia

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-38064 MARGARET B. RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. AMANDA C. TAPIA, Respondent-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Sylvia F. Lamar, District Judge Catron, Catron & Glassman, P.A.

Richard S. Glassman Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Cuddy & McCarthy, LLP Aaron J. Wolf Santa Fe, NM for Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Chief Judge. {1} Summary affirmance in part and reversal in part was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance in part and reversal in part has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. Affirmed in part, reversed in part. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.