New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2021

State v. Secatero

State v. Secatero
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided May 17, 2021

State v. Secatero

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-38660 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYSON SECATERO, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SOCORRO COUNTY Matthew G. Reynolds, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Albert J. Costales Law Office Albert J. Costales Truth or Consequences, NM for Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Chief Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.