Kruskal v. Taos Diner
Kruskal v. Taos Diner
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-39414 KERRY KRUSKAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAOS DINER, Defendant-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Emilio J. Chavez, District Judge Kerry Kruskal Arroyo Seco, NM Pro Se Appellant Taos Diner El Prado, NM Pro Se Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION DUFFY, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge WE CONCUR: SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.